In response to Colombian President Alvaro Uribe's military assault on a FARC camp in Ecuador, Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez and Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa amassed troops on the Colombian border. Chavez and Correa are incensed because they say Uribe violated Ecuador's sovereignty. Chavez announced that if Uribe tried to take similar actions on the Venezuelan border, then Venezuela would go to war.
The Colombians claim they were attacked from across the Ecuadorian border by FARC rebels and acted in self-defense. Furthermore, Colombian Police Commander Gen. Oscar Naranjo says that Colombian forces found electronic documents in FARC's camp that tie President Correa to Raul Reyes, the FARC's former leader. If Naranjo is telling the truth, then this is likely a case of a state's (i.e., Ecuador's) active support for terrorism as a foreign policy tool.
By using a terrorist group as the unofficial arm of the state, a government can launch attacks against an adversarial state while maintaining its own irreproachability. For example, this is a tactic being used by Iran in the current Iraqi conflict. By clandestinely sponsoring a terrorist organization that has common objectives with the state, a government may attack an enemy state indirectly.
The victimized state then would have a few options: it could choose to attack the sponsoring state directly, in which case it would need conclusive evidence of the connection between the terrorists and their sponsor state--the absence of which would cause the victim-state to appear to be the aggressor (like in the current situation in which Colombia will be perceived as the aggressor unless it can prove that Ecuador knowingly allowed FARC to attack Colombians from its border).
A second option for the victim-state could be to attack the terrorist organization, but if the terrorists are hiding across the state's border, then it would have to justify violating the other (sponsoring) state's sovereignty by providing some type of evidence that it was, indeed, acting in self-dense (e.g. Colombia's "self-defense" argument).
Finally, the victim-state could choose to do nothing except wait for the terrorists to strike again; however, this approach would make the victim-state appear weak not only in the eyes of the terrorists and those of the sponsoring state but also in the eyes of the victim-state's own citizens.
Thus, if one state is confident that it could attack another state indirectly via a clandestinely-sponsored terrorist organization, and if the sponsoring-state is confident that any connections between it and the terrorists would either not be revealed or be nebulous, at best; then the sponsoring-state may, in fact, allow such an attack to take place--knowing that the victimized state would likely be incapable of gathering enough hard evidence to sufficiently justify a proportional retaliatory strike against the sponsor-state.
This may be what is occurring in South America right now with Ecuador (and maybe Venezuela) as the sponsoring state(s), FARC as the proxy, and Colombia as the victim. Then again, this whole line of reasoning could be complete rubbish. What do you think?
Sunday, March 2, 2008
Iran-Iraq relations???
http://www.radionetherlands.nl/news/international/5666601/Iran-leader-accuses-US-of-terrorism
I read this article on Radio Netherlands Worldwide about the Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad visiting Iraq. In the article it said that it was the first time that a Irani president has visited Iraq since Saddam Hussein launched an eight-year war with Iran that by 1988 had claimed a million victims. During his visit President Mahmoud called the United States a terroriest. He said that the U.S. brought terrorism to the Middle East in 2003 when they invaded Iraq. However, since the U.S. has removed Saddam from power it allows Iran to have contact with Iraq now. This makes me wonder about a few things. One is that since Iran and Iraq have there majority of thre population being Shiite, I wonder if this will increase the friendlyness of the two countries. I think that this could cause a problem for the U.S. since Iran is calling them terrorist. I also wonder how this new relationship would effect the rest of the middle east. I am also wondering what the U.S. thinks about this and if there going to try and do anything to stop it. Well Tell me what you think.
Thanks
Austin Conners
I read this article on Radio Netherlands Worldwide about the Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad visiting Iraq. In the article it said that it was the first time that a Irani president has visited Iraq since Saddam Hussein launched an eight-year war with Iran that by 1988 had claimed a million victims. During his visit President Mahmoud called the United States a terroriest. He said that the U.S. brought terrorism to the Middle East in 2003 when they invaded Iraq. However, since the U.S. has removed Saddam from power it allows Iran to have contact with Iraq now. This makes me wonder about a few things. One is that since Iran and Iraq have there majority of thre population being Shiite, I wonder if this will increase the friendlyness of the two countries. I think that this could cause a problem for the U.S. since Iran is calling them terrorist. I also wonder how this new relationship would effect the rest of the middle east. I am also wondering what the U.S. thinks about this and if there going to try and do anything to stop it. Well Tell me what you think.
Thanks
Austin Conners
U.S. behind Pakistan terrorism
I found this interesting article thats recounts something that was said by a Pakistani politician recently. This person believes that the United States, Afghanistan, and India are responsible for terrorism inside Pakistan
According to Caretaker interior minister, Lieutenant General (Retd) Hamid Nawaz Khan, the United States is attempting to annihilate Muslims worldwide, the Afghan government is apparently just another extension of the US military, and India is just out to get them.
He admits that he has no proof of this, but that his people had a feeling about it. He explained that ever since the Taliban offensive in Afghanistan has gone down, the number of terrorist incidents in Pakistan has gone up. I don't really see that connection, but even if it is there, I don't see how the United States, Afghanistan, and India can be blamed for that. His explanation is that the kind of attacks that are occurring in Pakistan (mostly suicide bombings) need funding from larger countries, and countries which are unfriendly towards Pakistan are more likely to fund terrorism within the country.
I knew we weren't best of friends with Pakistan, but it's interesting how this particular politician is convinced that we must be sponsoring terrorism to destroy them.
According to Caretaker interior minister, Lieutenant General (Retd) Hamid Nawaz Khan, the United States is attempting to annihilate Muslims worldwide, the Afghan government is apparently just another extension of the US military, and India is just out to get them.
He admits that he has no proof of this, but that his people had a feeling about it. He explained that ever since the Taliban offensive in Afghanistan has gone down, the number of terrorist incidents in Pakistan has gone up. I don't really see that connection, but even if it is there, I don't see how the United States, Afghanistan, and India can be blamed for that. His explanation is that the kind of attacks that are occurring in Pakistan (mostly suicide bombings) need funding from larger countries, and countries which are unfriendly towards Pakistan are more likely to fund terrorism within the country.
I knew we weren't best of friends with Pakistan, but it's interesting how this particular politician is convinced that we must be sponsoring terrorism to destroy them.
Peace Talks Halted
In a recent round of violence between Israel and the Palestinians, Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas has halted negotiations in light of retaliatory Israeli bombings which have already taken dozens of Palestinian lives. Casualties of the violence numbered 70 on Sunday alone. Hamas still refuses to recognize Israel though I wonder if the average Palestinian feels as strongly about the issue as the Hamas leadership.
While the majority of those slain have been Palestinians, Israeli civilians like those in the border city of Sderot are also suffering from the violence. Thirteen Israelis have been killed so far by the recent rocket fire from Palestinian militants. The BBC reports, "People think twice about walking the streets, shopping for food and clothes, and letting their children play outdoors. Businesses have few customers, house prices have dropped dramatically, and more than 3,000 of the town's 24,000 residents have upped and left." If the goal of the terrorists is to coerce Israelis by inspiring paralyzing fear, it seems like they've done a good job, at least in some parts of Israel.
I found this quote by Ahmed Abdullah particularly interesting. He said of Hamas, "they need to be given a chance, they need to breathe--if you give Hamas a political opportunity then it will only moderate the movement." Many in Gaza view the bombings from Israel as punishment for supporting Hamas.
Although democratically elected by the Palestinians to represent them, could this be an example where democracy is something that the United States should not support, or is Abdullah correct in thinking that increased political power for Hamas will lessen the need it feels to resort to violence?
BBC News: Cat and Mouse, Abbas Breaks Contact
While the majority of those slain have been Palestinians, Israeli civilians like those in the border city of Sderot are also suffering from the violence. Thirteen Israelis have been killed so far by the recent rocket fire from Palestinian militants. The BBC reports, "People think twice about walking the streets, shopping for food and clothes, and letting their children play outdoors. Businesses have few customers, house prices have dropped dramatically, and more than 3,000 of the town's 24,000 residents have upped and left." If the goal of the terrorists is to coerce Israelis by inspiring paralyzing fear, it seems like they've done a good job, at least in some parts of Israel.
I found this quote by Ahmed Abdullah particularly interesting. He said of Hamas, "they need to be given a chance, they need to breathe--if you give Hamas a political opportunity then it will only moderate the movement." Many in Gaza view the bombings from Israel as punishment for supporting Hamas.
Although democratically elected by the Palestinians to represent them, could this be an example where democracy is something that the United States should not support, or is Abdullah correct in thinking that increased political power for Hamas will lessen the need it feels to resort to violence?
BBC News: Cat and Mouse, Abbas Breaks Contact
Saturday, March 1, 2008
Kosovars and Kurds
I was reading an Economist article about Kosovo's declaration of independence, and I wondered why Kosovars seem to be so different from other ethnic minorities who have sought, or are seeking, independence. All things considered, Kosovo's transition has gone pretty smoothly. I haven't heard of any terrorist attacks in connection with Kosovar independence. But then look at the Kurds; obviously their quest for an independent state has been violent. Why the difference? Both involve minority groups of Muslims seeking independent states for their people. Was it just because Kosovo was a UN protectorate before its declaration--so ethnic Albanians were basically already running Kosovo? I shy away from giving too much credit to international presence, because the skirmishers in northern Iraq are undoubtedly aware of the US and British presences in the state. Does the terrorism with the Kurds and lack thereof with the Kosovars have anything to do with international opinion? It's been pretty clear for a while that many powerful states would back Kosovo's independence, but there's less support--as far as I'm aware--for an independent Kurdistan. This change in the international system not only presents the question of terrorism differences with Kurds and Kosovars, but also presents a question about future terrorism ties. With previously existing Muslim states supporting this new Muslim state in Europe, will terrorism ties and activity in Kosovo increase?
Does killing the leader kill the group ?
Top Farc leader killed
In the hunt to stop terrorists groups many times we hunt persons of interest or the leaders of these groups. In this case the leader was killed as a result of anti-terrorism efforts. My question is what difference does this make ? For example, if we caught Osama would al queda stop attacking ? One thing the article brings up is
"The killing of such a leading figure within Farc's secretariat, whose members are renowned for dying of natural causes, means the group's aura of invincibility has evaporated, our correspondent adds. "
So does the decapitation method they use work just as well against them ?
In the hunt to stop terrorists groups many times we hunt persons of interest or the leaders of these groups. In this case the leader was killed as a result of anti-terrorism efforts. My question is what difference does this make ? For example, if we caught Osama would al queda stop attacking ? One thing the article brings up is
"The killing of such a leading figure within Farc's secretariat, whose members are renowned for dying of natural causes, means the group's aura of invincibility has evaporated, our correspondent adds. "
So does the decapitation method they use work just as well against them ?
Friday, February 29, 2008
Hezbollah--acting from legitimate government position
A recent report out of the BBC cited a Hezbollah MP condemning the US for placing the USS Cole off the coast of Lebanon as a threat to independence and sovereignty. I find it fascinating that Hezbollah has come out against the US action through legitimate channels, but I wonder if such declarations represent a prelude to any violent activity from Hezbollah. Will the deployment of the USS Cole create a discontent which will promote more US targeted terrorist activity in the area? The MP, Hassan Fadlallah, told reporters, "We don't succumb to threats and military intimidation practised by the United States to implement its hegemony over Lebanon."
The US maintains that it deployed the ship to show support for regional stability--not to send a signal to any one country. Keeping the ship out of visible range of Lebanon may limit Hezbollah's ability to arouse popular discontent with the action, but then again, maybe not.
Tuesday, February 26, 2008
Exam question bleg
The study guide for the next exam (3/7-3/8) has been posted to the Blackboard course website. I'm still looking for a couple of good questions, though, so I'd like to see what you all come up with.
So, what questions would you ask on this exam? I generally look for questions that require students to demonstrate their understanding of ideas presented in multiple readings. And I generally list some of those authors in parentheses after the question. But I'm open to trying new kinds of questions.
If you have a good idea, attach it in the comments to this post. Thanks!
So, what questions would you ask on this exam? I generally look for questions that require students to demonstrate their understanding of ideas presented in multiple readings. And I generally list some of those authors in parentheses after the question. But I'm open to trying new kinds of questions.
If you have a good idea, attach it in the comments to this post. Thanks!
Fatwas Online
If anyone's interested in reading some fatwas online, I found a really good site. Enjoy!
Note- Please do not count this as my post for the week.
Note- Please do not count this as my post for the week.
Sunday, February 24, 2008
Kurds' terrorism threat to Turkish cities
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2008/02/24/wturkey124.xml
After bring up the discussion in class on Friday about Turkey crossing the Iraqi border I figured I could look up to see if there was any information for the class. In this article I found it. I found out that Kurdish separatists are threatening a new campaign of violence against Turkish cities as the country's army pressed on with its latest offensive against guerrilla positions in northern Iraq. The PKK, or Kurdistan Workers Party, vowed to "move the theatre of combat to the heart of Turkish cities" unless Ankara ends the military campaign, which began on Thursday. in the article it said, "The rebel group is believed to have numerous "sleepers" within Kurdish communities in cities such as Istanbul and Ankara, who are primed to carry out bomb attacks on military and government targets. Unleashing them, however, could raise tensions with the Turkish majority and lead to reprisals against Kurds." Even with the possiblity of the increase of tension the US is backing Turkey as long as it goes after PKK known members. I think that this could cause major problems in the Middle East, more then there already is. This problem needs to be solved soon, because these terrorist could have a possiblity of creating nuclear war. I hope you like the article let me know what you think.
Austin Conners
After bring up the discussion in class on Friday about Turkey crossing the Iraqi border I figured I could look up to see if there was any information for the class. In this article I found it. I found out that Kurdish separatists are threatening a new campaign of violence against Turkish cities as the country's army pressed on with its latest offensive against guerrilla positions in northern Iraq. The PKK, or Kurdistan Workers Party, vowed to "move the theatre of combat to the heart of Turkish cities" unless Ankara ends the military campaign, which began on Thursday. in the article it said, "The rebel group is believed to have numerous "sleepers" within Kurdish communities in cities such as Istanbul and Ankara, who are primed to carry out bomb attacks on military and government targets. Unleashing them, however, could raise tensions with the Turkish majority and lead to reprisals against Kurds." Even with the possiblity of the increase of tension the US is backing Turkey as long as it goes after PKK known members. I think that this could cause major problems in the Middle East, more then there already is. This problem needs to be solved soon, because these terrorist could have a possiblity of creating nuclear war. I hope you like the article let me know what you think.
Austin Conners
Misinterpretation of Islam
Here is an interesting article that I found in a Pakistani newspaper (You gotta love Google News). You can find the article here
The article states that students of various educational institutions, misinterpretation of Islam is one of the main causes of terrorism in Pakistan. Some Muslims in Pakistan misunderstand their own religion and believe that it promotes jihad against the West.
The article also says that several external forces contribute to the problem. One scholar said that poverty, illiteracy, poor leadership, lack of development programs, and a poor economy also influence the situation. Another scholar cited internal instability as a cause of terrorism.
This is an interesting article and I would recommend that you all check it out.
-Chris
The article states that students of various educational institutions, misinterpretation of Islam is one of the main causes of terrorism in Pakistan. Some Muslims in Pakistan misunderstand their own religion and believe that it promotes jihad against the West.
The article also says that several external forces contribute to the problem. One scholar said that poverty, illiteracy, poor leadership, lack of development programs, and a poor economy also influence the situation. Another scholar cited internal instability as a cause of terrorism.
This is an interesting article and I would recommend that you all check it out.
-Chris
Kosovo Liberation Army
With everything going on in Kosovo right now, I thought it would be a good idea to brush up on the KLA, or Kosovo Liberation Army. Here's a good description of the group. I also found a very interesting article on the KLA and other terrorist groups in Kosovo. While I disagree with the premise of the article, the information on al Qaeda's presence in Kosovo and the Balkans is interesting. (Sidenote- Bosnia was a part of my mission, but missionaries were not allowed to serve there. One of the main reasons we were told for this was because of the presence of radical Islamic fighters that stayed after fighting in the war.)From what the articles suggest, even though the KLA is officially disbanded, if Serbia really tries to prevent Kosovo from becoming independent, it wouldn't take long before Kosovars rally to the cause again.
Thursday, February 21, 2008
A little contest
Good afternoon, all. Once again, I have changed the header at the top of the blog. And I have some questions to ask about the famous international terrorists pictured both here, and in the new header.
Here are the contest rules: The first student with a correct answer to any of these questions gets a brownie point. Students answering more than one question are disqualified from the contest. All answers must come in comments appended to this post. Good luck!
Questions:
1. What is the (full) name this man was born with?
2. In what country was he born?
3. What was his nomme de guerre?
4. What is the title of the novel from which he got his famous moniker?
5. What is the (full) name of the terrorist group with which he was associated in the early 1970s?
6. Where does he currently reside, and why?
Because of my recent bout with mononucleosis, I have had really weird cycles of extreme sleeplessness followed by days of extreme fatigue. Tonight I wasn’t able to sleep so I decided to peruse the news. As I was browsing the international news section of CNN, a news alert flashed across my screen that was pertinent to our class. However, before one reads this latest news article I wanted to sort of chronicle the events that have lead up to this latest attack.
In the past week, renewed tensions between the LTTE and the Sri Lankan government have come to a head. The Sri Lankan government officially pulled out of a truce with the LTTE last month; it was a truce which had begun earlier this year. Immediately after withdrawing out of this truce, the Sri Lankan government began shelling suspected militant hideouts. The LTTE said that the targets of the shellings were merely Tamil civilians and that the government was not targeting them (read: the LTTE) but rather they were targeting ethnic Tamils in a bid to try and coerce their people.
In response, the LTTE reinstituted their campaign of terror. Their first act was a suicide attack on a civilian bus that killed 12 and wounded 100. A dozen or more attacks then followed: the LTTE was also implicated in a hand-grenade attack on a local zoo and on the Sri Lankan Independence Day, the LTTE staged a variety of attacks, which killed 13 and wounded even more.
Recently this week, the LTTE ambushed 3 Sri Lankan soldiers and executed them south of their “safe zone of de facto control.” The government responded with aerial bombings of suspected militant strongholds and hideouts.
All of these attacks have been increasing in crescendo. In fact, today, there was another governmental response to the LTTE’s previous attacks: the government killed an estimated 46 rebels and destroyed 5 bunkers in a new offensive aimed at curbing the violence. It seems that the violence is going to continue to escalate, for the LTTE has already vowed to respond to this latest governmental attack.
My question is this: for anyone who is familiar with the LTTE, why did they “mysteriously” agree to a cease fire after September 11, 2001? Why didn’t the government accept their terms of greater autonomy (read: the LTTE dropped their demands for independence)? Why did the cease fire fail? Why did the 2006 ceasefire fail? And furthermore, why did this most recent cease fire fail?
PS Another interesting news article linked to the CNN article that stemmed all of this musing can be found at BBC Sinhala.
In the past week, renewed tensions between the LTTE and the Sri Lankan government have come to a head. The Sri Lankan government officially pulled out of a truce with the LTTE last month; it was a truce which had begun earlier this year. Immediately after withdrawing out of this truce, the Sri Lankan government began shelling suspected militant hideouts. The LTTE said that the targets of the shellings were merely Tamil civilians and that the government was not targeting them (read: the LTTE) but rather they were targeting ethnic Tamils in a bid to try and coerce their people.
In response, the LTTE reinstituted their campaign of terror. Their first act was a suicide attack on a civilian bus that killed 12 and wounded 100. A dozen or more attacks then followed: the LTTE was also implicated in a hand-grenade attack on a local zoo and on the Sri Lankan Independence Day, the LTTE staged a variety of attacks, which killed 13 and wounded even more.
Recently this week, the LTTE ambushed 3 Sri Lankan soldiers and executed them south of their “safe zone of de facto control.” The government responded with aerial bombings of suspected militant strongholds and hideouts.
All of these attacks have been increasing in crescendo. In fact, today, there was another governmental response to the LTTE’s previous attacks: the government killed an estimated 46 rebels and destroyed 5 bunkers in a new offensive aimed at curbing the violence. It seems that the violence is going to continue to escalate, for the LTTE has already vowed to respond to this latest governmental attack.
My question is this: for anyone who is familiar with the LTTE, why did they “mysteriously” agree to a cease fire after September 11, 2001? Why didn’t the government accept their terms of greater autonomy (read: the LTTE dropped their demands for independence)? Why did the cease fire fail? Why did the 2006 ceasefire fail? And furthermore, why did this most recent cease fire fail?
PS Another interesting news article linked to the CNN article that stemmed all of this musing can be found at BBC Sinhala.
Wednesday, February 20, 2008
Israeli/Palestinian Peace Talks
This article http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7252305.stm discusses recent Israeli/Palestinian attempts to formulate a plan for peace regarding Jerusalem and the creation of a Palestinian state. Tension has dominated the peace talks and increased with militant activity in Gaza and the Israeli plan to build a number of homes in East Jerusalem. Both sides hope to reach an agreement soon before negotiations become improbable. Many wonder what a peace settlement between Israelis and Palestinians would look like because Palestinians want East Jerusalem to be their capitol while Israelis claim the entire city. It seems that peace talks like this are ongoing in the Middle East yet never resolved. Does anyone know more about how many attempts have been made to negotiate peace among Israelis and Palestinians?
Tuesday, February 19, 2008
Terrorism, Counter-Terrorism, and Star Wars
I was looking for something to post about and I discovered that the content from a pro-terrorist site I have used to post in the past was "removed by the user." I thought this was a little odd and started to look around and I found something very interesting. There are a lot sites that support terrorists on the internet, many of which are hosted in the US. I then found a bunch of sites devoted to the downfall and removal of these pro-terrorist sites. These sites request users to file complaints to servers hosting pro-terrorist sites to stop them from spreading their messages. The site which seems to be popular (other sites/blogs have links to this site or refer to it) in fighting these pro-terrorist sites is called The Jawa Report. After poking around on their site and reading what the whole Star-Wars Jawa analogy stuff was all about I thought it was pretty interesting. These people see themselves as players in what is going on with terrorism in the world, and they use Star-Wars characters to identify different actors. They are taking a very active (there have been two new posts since i started writing this entry) role to prevent terrorists from spreading their message and gaining support here in the US, and it seems that they have been successful on various occasions. It is interesting to think that there is a cyber-struggle going on for space to spread ideals. I don't know if these people are really having a large impact because the people who read the pro-terrorist sites regularly usually tend to agree with them and will find pro-terrorist propaganda elsewhere. Either way, at least they are trying to have a positive impact.
Hidden Terrorists
Last week we talked about members of terrorist groups that blend in with the rest of the population. Last September there was a young man in Germany that was arrested for transporting chemicals to Pakistan. Here is the article.
A Sick, Twisted Little Bunny
I just came across this clip from Hamas TV. The only thing I can compare it to is Bugs Bunny having a bad acid trip.
Monday, February 18, 2008
A [Silly] Question. . .
I was home with the family this holiday weekend, and my 7-year-old sister got me thinking. At one point on Sunday evening she wasn't getting her way, and like any good youngest child, she began screaming and crying. Her sobs were obviously not motivated by real pain, but geared towards getting attention and sympathy.
This brought to mind the terrorist strategy of armed propaganda, and leads to this question: Are childish outbursts a form of low-grade terrorism, or is terrorism simply an overblown temper tantrum? Perhaps both? Neither?
Interpreting God
As compared to secular terrorists, religious terrorists inflict a lot more casualties on enemy targets. According to Hoffman, it is because of, "radically different value systems, mechanisms of legitimation and justification, and concepts of morality".What seems so ironic to me about this is that religiously motivated terrorists seemingly value human life less than secular terrorists, who see killing a large number of innocent civilians as immoral and counter productive to their goals.
In regard to Islamic terrorism, it seems that the promise of the after life has blurred their line between a moral and immoral act. While secular terrorists seek to improve the world for the present times, religious terrorists have fewer qualms about killing "infidels" because it is sanctioned in the Koran. But, who is to say what the criteria should be for determining an enemy of Islam?
Sunday, February 17, 2008
Hezbollah still has 2 Israeli Soldiers
We sort of talked about this in class on Friday, so I did some research and found this article. It really did take some research, because like we discussed, the international community has largely forgotten that these two soldiers are still being held. Barely anything has been written on them until today, when it came out that they may soon be officially classified as "dead". It's unfortunate that no one seemed to put much sustained pressure on Hezbollah to release them. These are the two soldiers that were kidnapped during a cross-border raid in July of 2007. They are the reason that Israel attacked Hezbollah, and the fact the they are still being held is the reason Hezbollah is claiming victory, while Olmert struggles to stay in power in Israel.
Musharraf Says Election Vital to Anti-Terrorism Fight
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=a31ISoTro0dY&refer=home
This article is on the Pakistani elections for parilament that are coming up tomorrow. During these last few weeks of camaigning there has been terrorist attacks. Most recently was yesterday (the final day of campaigning)suicide bomber killed at least 38. he attacker, driving a car laden with explosives, struck in the northwestern tribal town of Parachinar yesterday, about eight miles (13 kilometers) from the border with Afghanistan. He targeted the offices of opposition election candidate Syed Riaz Hussain Shah. In this article, President Pervez Musharraf said tomorrow's parliamentary elections are vital to Pakistan's fight against terrorism. In this article the attacks during the campainging were not called terrorist attacks, they were called by militant attacks, including the Dec. 27 assassination of former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto. This surpised me. So I wonder why in some countries they call attacks, "Acts of Terror" and in other countries they are called "militant attacks". I also wonder about AL Queda's presents in the tribal villages of Pakistan. I hope you guys like the article and can fill me in on some new info.
Thanks
Austin Conners
This article is on the Pakistani elections for parilament that are coming up tomorrow. During these last few weeks of camaigning there has been terrorist attacks. Most recently was yesterday (the final day of campaigning)suicide bomber killed at least 38. he attacker, driving a car laden with explosives, struck in the northwestern tribal town of Parachinar yesterday, about eight miles (13 kilometers) from the border with Afghanistan. He targeted the offices of opposition election candidate Syed Riaz Hussain Shah. In this article, President Pervez Musharraf said tomorrow's parliamentary elections are vital to Pakistan's fight against terrorism. In this article the attacks during the campainging were not called terrorist attacks, they were called by militant attacks, including the Dec. 27 assassination of former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto. This surpised me. So I wonder why in some countries they call attacks, "Acts of Terror" and in other countries they are called "militant attacks". I also wonder about AL Queda's presents in the tribal villages of Pakistan. I hope you guys like the article and can fill me in on some new info.
Thanks
Austin Conners
Saturday, February 16, 2008
Facebook and the FARC
A recent Economist article took a different take on terrorism and media. In class last week we discussed the benefits and drawbacks of the media with regards to terrorism. Specifically, how terrorist organizations benefit from new media like the internet, satellite TV stations, and cheap video production equipment and costs. This article didn't discuss internet anonymity or recruiting techniques, but how it can be used for counter-terrorism measures. Oscar Morales created the Facebook group "One million voices against the FARC," which organized marches against the terrorist organization on February 4th. Apparently, most Colombians are sick of the FARC and are standing up to them in some degree. 700-plus hostages later, the FARC no longer has the support (whether passive or active) of the public, and most people are blaming them (instead of the Colombian government) for the continuation of the hostage crisis. It's interesting to see another use of the internet...and one which doesn't benefit terrorists. Who would have thought Facebook could be a counter-terrorism tool--organizing over a million people to demonstrate to the world and the FARC, itself, a change in public sentiment?
Al-Qaeda Defeated in Baghdad
From the article: " Iraqi Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki proclaimed on Friday that Al-Qaeda had been routed in Baghdad thanks to a security plan launched a year ago, and would soon be defeated throughout the country."
Though it seems the surge in Iraq has had an affect on the amount of attacks and casualties in Iraq since its inception (attacks down 62 percent since last June in all of Iraq), it is hard for one to say that Al-Qaeda has been "routed" or "defeated" completely. In our studies of the network structure in terrorist groups, especially Al-Qaeda, it cannot be fully known the extent to which the organization exists or doesn't exist. This announcement may signal better success but to infer that the job in Baghdad is complete is very hard to accept.
Greg
Though it seems the surge in Iraq has had an affect on the amount of attacks and casualties in Iraq since its inception (attacks down 62 percent since last June in all of Iraq), it is hard for one to say that Al-Qaeda has been "routed" or "defeated" completely. In our studies of the network structure in terrorist groups, especially Al-Qaeda, it cannot be fully known the extent to which the organization exists or doesn't exist. This announcement may signal better success but to infer that the job in Baghdad is complete is very hard to accept.
Greg
Terrorists see Women as to weak to rule countries
"It’s no wonder why the Prophet (sallallahu ‘alayhi wassallam) said, “The nation that has entrusted its affairs to a woman cannot be successful.” Aside from a woman’s weakness of her period and the affects it has on her (as has been proven scientifically), the pressure around her will be so great and momentous that it will be easy for her to make an enormous mistake that is rooted in her emotional veins. If Clinton is elected as President, it would be good for the Ummah. Why? Because America would crumble very fast. "
This puts forth a very intresting point of view from the terrroist perspective that women are not an enemy because they are weak. If muslims extremists see women as so weak how can we use that to a counter-terroist tool ?
This puts forth a very intresting point of view from the terrroist perspective that women are not an enemy because they are weak. If muslims extremists see women as so weak how can we use that to a counter-terroist tool ?
Friday, February 15, 2008
U.S. Presidential Elections
I remember a question being raised in class asking if terrorist organizations are concerned about and observing the current presidential elections. I found an interesting review of the candidates by a website that spreads various terrorist propaganda. It is clear that these people are paying attention to the current race and thinking of what will happen when one of them is elected. The thing that I found most interesting in this analysis is that the author claims that whoever is put into the oval office will be elected according to Allah's will.
Wednesday, February 13, 2008
Suicide Bombers' Burial
I've never realized what happened to suicide bombers' bodies after the attacks. This is an interesting article that explains it. If you read it, notice what the mullahs says about killing oneself and others. The article discusses the debate over this.
Tuesday, February 12, 2008
Israeli-sponsored terrorism?
I found an interesting article online today. You can find it here
Basically Saudi Arabia seems to be siding with the Palestinians, and saying that what Israel is doing to them is state sponsored terrorism. Saudi Arabia said that the international community needs to take a stand and pressure Israel to end these "atrocities".
I find this very interesting. I don't know enough about the entire situation to form an educated opinion, but I do know (from this class and others), that Palestinian terrorists constantly carry out suicide bomb missions against Israel. Is that not considered terrorism, or atrocities, by Saudi Arabia? While I understand the Palestinian grievances, I don't think terrorism is the way to address them, and I certainly don't place blame on Israel for trying to defend their cities.
What do you think? Who is guilty of terrorism here in this situation?
Basically Saudi Arabia seems to be siding with the Palestinians, and saying that what Israel is doing to them is state sponsored terrorism. Saudi Arabia said that the international community needs to take a stand and pressure Israel to end these "atrocities".
I find this very interesting. I don't know enough about the entire situation to form an educated opinion, but I do know (from this class and others), that Palestinian terrorists constantly carry out suicide bomb missions against Israel. Is that not considered terrorism, or atrocities, by Saudi Arabia? While I understand the Palestinian grievances, I don't think terrorism is the way to address them, and I certainly don't place blame on Israel for trying to defend their cities.
What do you think? Who is guilty of terrorism here in this situation?
Sunday, February 10, 2008
Terrorism may become a salient issue in polls
http://www.livemint.com/2008/02/11003646/Terrorism-may-become-a-salient.html
I found this article on the effect of terrorism on voting. This article specifically talks about The United Progressive Alliance (UPA) in theBharatiya Janata Party (BJP). It discusses how tactics on terrorism may have to become one of the parties main platforms. During the UPA rule, a series of terrorist attacks have taken place in the last four years. All these terrorist attacks have also occurred in then Congress-ruled states of Maharashtra, Delhi, Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka have led to the allegation that the Congress party is “soft on terror” and lacks the political will to curb terrorism. This is the main reason that he UPA has changed it tactics and views. I wonder if anyone knows if terrorism has been effecting voting in other countries besides that United States. Also, is changing Parties platform the only way to change public opinion on its views on terrorism . I hope that this gets some interesting convo.
Thanks
Austin Conners
I found this article on the effect of terrorism on voting. This article specifically talks about The United Progressive Alliance (UPA) in theBharatiya Janata Party (BJP). It discusses how tactics on terrorism may have to become one of the parties main platforms. During the UPA rule, a series of terrorist attacks have taken place in the last four years. All these terrorist attacks have also occurred in then Congress-ruled states of Maharashtra, Delhi, Andhra Pradesh and Karnataka have led to the allegation that the Congress party is “soft on terror” and lacks the political will to curb terrorism. This is the main reason that he UPA has changed it tactics and views. I wonder if anyone knows if terrorism has been effecting voting in other countries besides that United States. Also, is changing Parties platform the only way to change public opinion on its views on terrorism . I hope that this gets some interesting convo.
Thanks
Austin Conners
A New Generation
The Al - Qaeda in Iraq is recruiting children to carry out their operations. The US and Iraqi forces recently released a footage showing children under the age of 11 participating in terrorist activities. We discussed in class that terrorists tend to recruit individuals who can be easily persuaded to carry out their operations. Children of that age are easily brainwashed and ask little if any questions. Besides that, these children are recruited for attracting other young children and teenagers. Also, since children raise very little suspicion by their activities, it is easy for them to carry out any operation as long as they have the proper training.
Australian anti-terrorism
I found this interesting article that described recent efforts from Australia to combat anti-terrorism. You can find the article here
I this article it is says that the EU recently agreed with Australia to share information about airline passengers traveling from Europe to Australia. The US and Canada already have access to this information, and now Australia will be able to check private data of passengers.
I think it's good to see Australia and the EU cooperating to increase the anti-terrorism efforts of Australia. I hope that similar agreements can be made with other countries.
I this article it is says that the EU recently agreed with Australia to share information about airline passengers traveling from Europe to Australia. The US and Canada already have access to this information, and now Australia will be able to check private data of passengers.
I think it's good to see Australia and the EU cooperating to increase the anti-terrorism efforts of Australia. I hope that similar agreements can be made with other countries.
Saturday, February 9, 2008
Organization in Lebanon
This Economist article discusses three problems in Lebanon threatening its "peace." One, predictably, is the car bomb that killed Wissam Eid in late January. The article, referring to Eid's position as an intelligence officer investigating assassinations for the UN says, "his death sent the chilling message that someone will stop at nothing to wreck the case before it comes before a special international tribunal due to be set up in the Hague." This is interesting to me because of the obvious organization required to plan the sabotage of the UN's investigation. In class on Friday, Group C presented on the Irgun and different components of the organization (the Sea, Delek, HATAM, HAT...you can see this on the powerpoint presentation they emailed everyone). This was the first discussion we've had on organizational structures (other than the existence of recruiters) within terrorist organizations, and it got me thinking about the division of labor: only some terrorists are actual militant fighters, others plan, others gather intelligence, etc. So Wissam Eid's murder was more than a car bomb fatality and more than an assassination; it involved lots of strategic planning from people with different assignments within the same organization. Furthermore, it was only part of a larger strategy to botch a UN investigation. When you think beyond the headlines, you can see how much organization and effort actually go into successful attacks.
Terrorist Television Programs
I read this story a while back; it relates directly to the discussion that we had in class about the attempts of terrorist organizations to indoctrinate youth through media programs. Not only does this Hamas channel have children's programs, they also have "MTV-type" programming, which would most likely target the teen demographic. I think it is interesting that this program is part of a "new strategy" for Hamas, as they try to use a more passive approach with which to penetrate Palestinian political and social systems. The members of Hamas definitely realize the importance that public support plays in their cause, and this program is their attempt to garner positive public opinion.
Friday, February 8, 2008
Jihadomerate
Following a story by the NYT in one of my previous posts about a 21-year old in North Carolina, I found a really interesting website called The Ignored Puzzle Pieces of Knowledge thats main purpose is to expose readers to the happenings in the lands of jihad. I did not find a specific affiliation for this website, from what I understand it is basically just trying to expose all us "hypocrites and infidels." The story on the main page was very interesting to me. They talk about how the U.S. got all bent out of shape over an Al-Qaeda video of a young boy with lots of guns dressed as Mujaahideen. They call us hypocrites by displaying a picture of a row of American boys holding and aiming rifles. Sure, in boy scouts I learned how to shoot and was extremely happy when one of my leaders had an automatic rifle for us to play with, but I think they are comparing apples and oranges. I believe that the firearm education and exposure are meant to ultimately lead to different ends.
A few terrorist websites
Here are some English-language terrorist websites I found. Enjoy!
Hizbollah
Islamic Army in Iraq
Some guy known as the "Baghdad Sniper"
There are some videos on those sites, so you may see things you wish you hadn't. But I noticed something interesting about those videos. Often, they'll launch a rocket somewhere, and no matter where it hits, it's considered a success. It's almost funny to see a rocket miss a Hummer, then hear the terrorists celebrating like they actually hit it. Oh well.
Hizbollah
Islamic Army in Iraq
Some guy known as the "Baghdad Sniper"
There are some videos on those sites, so you may see things you wish you hadn't. But I noticed something interesting about those videos. Often, they'll launch a rocket somewhere, and no matter where it hits, it's considered a success. It's almost funny to see a rocket miss a Hummer, then hear the terrorists celebrating like they actually hit it. Oh well.
Another contest
Seeing that no one has posted anything today, I thought it might be fun to have another little contest. So, I am asking some questions about the individual pictured here.Here are the contest rules: The first student with a correct answer to any of these questions gets a brownie point. Students answering more than one question are disqualified from the contest. All answers must come in comments appended to this post. Good luck!
Questions:
1. What is the name this man was born with?
2. What was the name he took when he converted to Islam?
3. What is he usually called in the press?
4. What is his ethnic background?
5. When he performed his attack, what country was he a citizen of?
6. What was the explosive he used in his operation?
Thursday, February 7, 2008
Abu Hamza al-Masri to be extradited to US
British courts have just ruled the al-Masri can be extradited to stand trial in the US. He is currently serving a prison sentence in England for "inciting racial hatred". In America he will be tried for a variety of crimes, including conspiracy to build a terrorist training camp in rural Oregon. I think this is very interesting. It shows that now, more than ever, western governments are willing to prosecute Muslim clerics who are outspoken extremists. I believe this is a good step in fighting terrorism. It seems like much of the hatred the radical Muslims have comes from their religious leaders. I think this sends a message to other Muslims leaders that they need to watch what they say. I'm wondering what the class thinks on this. Do you think that prosecutions like this can make a significant difference?
Wednesday, February 6, 2008
Al Qaeda seen planning attack on U.S.
This was just posted at the Washington Times - Story
From the story:
From the story:
"Senior al Qaeda leaders have diverted operatives from Iraq across the globe and are increasing preparations to strike the United States, senior intelligence officials told the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence yesterday. They said the terrorists had plans to attack the White House as recently as 2006.
"'Al Qaeda is improving the last key aspect of its ability to attack the U.S. — the identification, training and positioning of operatives for an attack in the homeland,' said Michael McConnell, director of national intelligence, which oversees all 16 U.S. intelligence agencies."
Greg
Globalization bleeds into Training Movies
Many people are going to be digusted by this type of video that shows Al queda training children as soldiers. Article on Video. Something that I couldn't help noticing about the video was that the boys were all running around in nice jerseys and training pants with what logo on them Addiads and Nike both American companies. It is intresting that these organizations say that they are motivated by the desire to resist the influences of western culture show the boys in so blatantly american clothes which no doubt are popular. Is it a good recruitment method to give recruits nice american clothes to join the war against america ?
Tuesday, February 5, 2008
Tamil Tigers Website
After discussing and reading so much about the media and its influence on terrorism and the different terrorist groups throughout the world I thought it would be interesting to take a look at what is considered to be, according to Hoffman, one of the most media savvy terrorist groups, the Tamil Tigers. They have several different websites, including this one. The book discusses the fact that there is little if any attention focused on the terrorist acts that they commit, but rather the websites are dedicated to discussing matters of freedom and the origins, etc. of the group. Looking at the homepage alone of this website I find it to be very interesting. This is the opening statement given on the homepage, just a glimpse of what the entire site is about, "Our organisation, as well as our people do not want war. We want peace and we want to resolve our problems through peaceful means. We are deeply committed to the peace process. It is because of our sincere commitment to peace that we are firmly and rigidly observing ceasefire. It is our organisation that took the initiative of declaring the cessation of hostilities unilaterally and observing peace for the last two years tolerating the provocative actions of the state's armed forces. . "This is something that I thought might be interesting to have posted on the blog.
Monday, February 4, 2008
Suicide Bombings in Israel
Israel Hit by Suicide Attack
Fatah, the PFLP, and a previously unknown 'United Popular Brigade' are all claiming some responsibility for the suicide attacks this morning. The attackers used the weakened separation barrier to conduct the attacks, reportedly crossing into Egypt before entering Israel.
Initially Palestinians seemed to be using the Hamas-induced barrier breach to buy food and supplies to offset the scarcity created by Israeli counter-terror measures that at varying times left impoverished Gazans without electricity or access to markets. In doing so, Hamas has once again established itself as the champion of the people.
As a result of the suicide bombing and due to Israeli suspicion concerning the nature of Palestinian purchases, however, the barrier breach will no doubt lead to harsh counter measures by Israeli forces that tend to punish the Gazan population just as much as the terrorists responsible.
Even though Israel's separation barrier has received international criticism for violating Palestinian human rights, it still seems to be the best way to prevent suicide bombings in Israel. Despite the suffering of the Palestinians in Gaza, the suicide bombings that took place Monday provide further justification for the need of a separation barrier.
Fatah, the PFLP, and a previously unknown 'United Popular Brigade' are all claiming some responsibility for the suicide attacks this morning. The attackers used the weakened separation barrier to conduct the attacks, reportedly crossing into Egypt before entering Israel.
Initially Palestinians seemed to be using the Hamas-induced barrier breach to buy food and supplies to offset the scarcity created by Israeli counter-terror measures that at varying times left impoverished Gazans without electricity or access to markets. In doing so, Hamas has once again established itself as the champion of the people.
As a result of the suicide bombing and due to Israeli suspicion concerning the nature of Palestinian purchases, however, the barrier breach will no doubt lead to harsh counter measures by Israeli forces that tend to punish the Gazan population just as much as the terrorists responsible.
Even though Israel's separation barrier has received international criticism for violating Palestinian human rights, it still seems to be the best way to prevent suicide bombings in Israel. Despite the suffering of the Palestinians in Gaza, the suicide bombings that took place Monday provide further justification for the need of a separation barrier.
Sunday, February 3, 2008
Egypt-Gaza border resealed
Egypt-Gaza border resealed
This article highlights the governmental structure/integration with Hamas and their demanding to be recognized internationally.
"Gaza's Hamas rulers are demanding new border arrangements that would give it a say in administration. But that looks doubtful with the international community opposed to any role for the Islamic militant group in running the crossing."
"Bearded Hamas police worked in tandem with the Egyptians, trying to keep the crowd back. It was a marked change from several days ago, when uniformed Hamas men thwarted Egyptian attempts to reseal the border."
Not fully understanding the reasons for the breach, but I see it as a stunt to try to legitimize or put the spotlight on Hamas as a legit governmental organization. These attempts to "give it a say in the administration" and "working in tandem with the Egyptians," brings focus to them and seems to make them more credible as a governmental organization.
Greg
This article highlights the governmental structure/integration with Hamas and their demanding to be recognized internationally.
"Gaza's Hamas rulers are demanding new border arrangements that would give it a say in administration. But that looks doubtful with the international community opposed to any role for the Islamic militant group in running the crossing."
"Bearded Hamas police worked in tandem with the Egyptians, trying to keep the crowd back. It was a marked change from several days ago, when uniformed Hamas men thwarted Egyptian attempts to reseal the border."
Not fully understanding the reasons for the breach, but I see it as a stunt to try to legitimize or put the spotlight on Hamas as a legit governmental organization. These attempts to "give it a say in the administration" and "working in tandem with the Egyptians," brings focus to them and seems to make them more credible as a governmental organization.
Greg
Interesting article
I just came across this interesting article that states that engineers are more prone to terrorism then other academic backgrounds, because "such people are high achievers and often get sucked into radicalism out of frustration with their corrupt bureaucracies." You can find the article here
The sociologist in this study surveyed 404 militants in 31 countries and found that out of the 178 who had academic backgrounds, the results fell into the following categories:
Engineering: 78
Islamic Studies: 34
Medicine: 14
Economics/Business: 12
The authors said that engineers are typically high achievers who advance by merit, and this could make them more frustrated with the establishment.
I think it is interesting that the sociologists came to this conclusion, but it is important to keep in mind that, according to the article, they defined "engineering" as architecture, all computer related areas, town planning, etc. They have a broader definition of terrorism then the standard "civil, mechanical and electronic engineering" definition that you or I might have.
Interesting study though. I would encourage you to read this article.
The sociologist in this study surveyed 404 militants in 31 countries and found that out of the 178 who had academic backgrounds, the results fell into the following categories:
Engineering: 78
Islamic Studies: 34
Medicine: 14
Economics/Business: 12
The authors said that engineers are typically high achievers who advance by merit, and this could make them more frustrated with the establishment.
I think it is interesting that the sociologists came to this conclusion, but it is important to keep in mind that, according to the article, they defined "engineering" as architecture, all computer related areas, town planning, etc. They have a broader definition of terrorism then the standard "civil, mechanical and electronic engineering" definition that you or I might have.
Interesting study though. I would encourage you to read this article.
US Kills al-Qaeda Commander
Last week, a UAV killed a top al-Qaeda commander in Pakistan. He is apparently responsible for much of the violence in Afghanistan. The fact that he was killed in Pakistan is very interesting, because the president of Pakistan has repeatedly said that he will not allow the US to strike within his country. I think this poses an interesting question. To what degree can a country violate the sovereignty of another government in the name of fighting terrorism. I think it's interesting to imagine what it would be like if someone did that to America. Like if Spain killed a Basque leader somewhere in America. Obviously, the government would be upset. Of course, I whole-heartedly approve of killing terrorists. But shouldn't we also be careful to not step on the toes of friendly governments? I'm wondering what everyone else thinks about this. Do you think it's okay to disregard a government's sovereignty in the name of the global war on terror?
Capitulation is not the answer.
I just had to write a little rebuttal to a comment made last class about the reading. In the reading, there is a quote from an Israeli policemen saying that he's scared, doesn't bring his family to the city of Jerusalem anymore and would give up his bank account and capitulate to the terrorists demands to have peace. Well, while this might seem like a sensible solution, there is absolutely no guarantee that suicide terror would discontinue or decline as a result of Israeli capitulation. In fact, quite to the contrary. The object of the terrorists is to create this fear, mistrust, and anxiety that paralyses the social infrastructure. Giving in to their demands and giving them what they want proves that their method is a good one. And, what would you do if you found a successful method to get what you want? Do it again and get more. Hamas does not recognize Israel as a sovereign nation. Giving in to them would allow them to up the ante, giving them legitimacy and encouragement to take all of Israel. Similar things can be said about the PIJ and PLO/PA even though the PLO/PA have already recognized Israel's legitimacy.
A comment was made in support to capitulation last class. That is the last thing that Israel should do. Let's look at the big picture.
A comment was made in support to capitulation last class. That is the last thing that Israel should do. Let's look at the big picture.
Friday, February 1, 2008
Baghdad Suicide Bombings
The article here discusses the suicide bombing that we talked about in class today. As it states, two female bombers detonated explosives in pet markets in Baghdad, killing a total of 72 people and injuring many others.
It is incredible to see the amount of damage that can be done by two people. Not only were 72 people killed, but the marketplace was destroyed. The emotional and psychological damage of such a tragedy is also evident in the statements made by witnesses of the event, who were beginning to hope that security in the nation's capital was improving. Additionally, the article notes that the city was ill-equipped for such a catastrophe. Bodies were carried out in pickup trucks and wheelbarrows, and the hospital was unable to adequately treat all the victims.
Overall, this article demonstrates the efficiency of suicide bombing. Terrorists were able to do a great deal of damage, with very few costs of their own.
Not only did this attack result in immediate physical and emotional damage, but it also revealed inefficiencies, as were demonstrated by the city's incapability to deal with the event.
It is incredible to see the amount of damage that can be done by two people. Not only were 72 people killed, but the marketplace was destroyed. The emotional and psychological damage of such a tragedy is also evident in the statements made by witnesses of the event, who were beginning to hope that security in the nation's capital was improving. Additionally, the article notes that the city was ill-equipped for such a catastrophe. Bodies were carried out in pickup trucks and wheelbarrows, and the hospital was unable to adequately treat all the victims.
Overall, this article demonstrates the efficiency of suicide bombing. Terrorists were able to do a great deal of damage, with very few costs of their own.
Not only did this attack result in immediate physical and emotional damage, but it also revealed inefficiencies, as were demonstrated by the city's incapability to deal with the event.
Thursday, January 31, 2008
New header
Good morning, everyone. Today we bid farewell, to our old pal Osama, because we have a new terrorist to head up our blog. As a reward for faithful blog participants, I offer one brownie point to the first student to post a comment correctly identifying the nom de guerre of the terrorist pictured in this FBI composite sketch. A second brownie point goes to the first student to give this terrorist's real name (spelling counts). A third brownie point will be awarded to the first student who posts a photograph (1994 or later) of this terrorist. No student will be awarded more than one brownie point, so don't post comments angling for all three.
Good luck!
--PROF. PAYNE
Wednesday, January 30, 2008
Taliban is again on the rise
Taliban is again on the rise
This article shows a good example of the social control that terrorists exercise over the areas around them. "The assault on one of the city's best-protected landmarks was the latest — and most dramatic — sign that the Taliban may be gaining strength more than six years after U.S.-led forces invaded to drive the Islamist militant movement from power." With the attack of these high profile targets in the local community the locals are scared of what could happen to them so even though we may be beating them back they have the social control still to the point where even beggars are distrusted "security fears have become so intense that he even shoos away beggars out of fear they could be wearing suicide vests". This leads to an open question after six years of battling the Taliban we apparently have not completely succeeded so What does it take to completely eliminate or beat a terrorist organization ?
This article shows a good example of the social control that terrorists exercise over the areas around them. "The assault on one of the city's best-protected landmarks was the latest — and most dramatic — sign that the Taliban may be gaining strength more than six years after U.S.-led forces invaded to drive the Islamist militant movement from power." With the attack of these high profile targets in the local community the locals are scared of what could happen to them so even though we may be beating them back they have the social control still to the point where even beggars are distrusted "security fears have become so intense that he even shoos away beggars out of fear they could be wearing suicide vests". This leads to an open question after six years of battling the Taliban we apparently have not completely succeeded so What does it take to completely eliminate or beat a terrorist organization ?
Tuesday, January 29, 2008
Internet Use by Terrorist Organizations
I recently read a very interesting article which addresses the topic we will be discussing in class tomorrow. In the article, a 21-year-old American is spreading propaganda of violent Islamic groups from his parents' home in North Carolina. Although the article states that there is no evidence that he is doing anything illegal, it is alarming to think that there could be many people with similar views close to home. We have no way of knowing if any such activists will one day commit an act of terrorism to further spread their message. The fact that he is a U.S. citizen proposes new threats to domestic security. As terrorist groups successfully recruit using new tools like the internet, their efforts to spread their message are facilitated. These new recruits do not have to worry about traveling into the United States, passports, papers, etc. Another interesting note in the article about terrorists using the internet is that "Since the beginning of the year, Al Qaeda’s media operation, Al Sahab, has issued new videotapes as often as every three days. Even more come from Iraq, where insurgents are pumping them out daily." Terrorists are using sophisticated techniques to indoctrinate and recruit, and I believe that they will be more successful as these technological tools provide avenues to "new fields" of recruitment.
Interesting Source for Suicide Terror Paper
I found this article at UT Austin, about a professor who has specialized in the study of terrorism. He brings up some interesting points about the recruitment of terrorists. In his book about Suicide terrorism he develops the idea that many suicide bombers are not poor illiterate souls who have a death wish. Nor do they even know who they are really killing themselves for. Instead they just think they are serving the people of their community and assume that this is the only way to establish change.
This is contrary to what I have heard about suicide terrorists, I have always assumed it was one of the down trodden society who were brainwashed into believing in the cause. But many of the people recruited are making conscious decisions to blow themselves up, usually because of some feeling or desire to improve the lives of their neighbors. It was also noted that the people believe they are sacrificing for the cause, suicide is not in the job description when being recruited. It's kinda funny how if you change the name of something it suddenly becomes not only acceptable but desirable.
This is contrary to what I have heard about suicide terrorists, I have always assumed it was one of the down trodden society who were brainwashed into believing in the cause. But many of the people recruited are making conscious decisions to blow themselves up, usually because of some feeling or desire to improve the lives of their neighbors. It was also noted that the people believe they are sacrificing for the cause, suicide is not in the job description when being recruited. It's kinda funny how if you change the name of something it suddenly becomes not only acceptable but desirable.
We're not the only ones....
The Article
Interestingly enough, the head of Australia's Federal Police has been under fire recently for using pre-emptive counter terrorist methods, similar to parts of the American public's recent disdain for some aspects of the Patriot Act such as wiretapping. The controversy in Australia stems from what Keelty, the chief of the AFP, calls the "tension, real or perceived, between the right to silence and a fair trial and the right of the community to access information." In the Australian case, the AFP recently brought to trial an Indian doctor whose case they ultimately had to dismiss. The press has called Keelty's anti-terrorism methods bad because he didn't have enough evidence beforehand to convict him. Keelty condemned the press for misleading the public and misrepresenting his agency and their counter terrorist tactics as poor. This article highlights the difficulties that governments face when fighting terrorism. Do they crack down hard and risk civil liberties groups complaints? Or do they ease up and risk terrorist attacks? There seems to be a very fine line that no government has been able to find yet. Where does that line exist? It is interesting that other countries are facing the same difficulties that the US is in fighting terrorists effectively while at the same time respecting the rights of their citizens.
Interestingly enough, the head of Australia's Federal Police has been under fire recently for using pre-emptive counter terrorist methods, similar to parts of the American public's recent disdain for some aspects of the Patriot Act such as wiretapping. The controversy in Australia stems from what Keelty, the chief of the AFP, calls the "tension, real or perceived, between the right to silence and a fair trial and the right of the community to access information." In the Australian case, the AFP recently brought to trial an Indian doctor whose case they ultimately had to dismiss. The press has called Keelty's anti-terrorism methods bad because he didn't have enough evidence beforehand to convict him. Keelty condemned the press for misleading the public and misrepresenting his agency and their counter terrorist tactics as poor. This article highlights the difficulties that governments face when fighting terrorism. Do they crack down hard and risk civil liberties groups complaints? Or do they ease up and risk terrorist attacks? There seems to be a very fine line that no government has been able to find yet. Where does that line exist? It is interesting that other countries are facing the same difficulties that the US is in fighting terrorists effectively while at the same time respecting the rights of their citizens.
Monday, January 28, 2008
Collective Punishment
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7211966.stm
Whether a stated strategy of Hamas, the groups actions have elicited the kind of response from Israel that could be classified as part of the Indirect Strategy or Outside Intervention Strategy. This article discusses the most recent actions taken by the Israeli government to stop terrorist action against their citizens. These actions have been heavy-handed and have allowed Hamas to gain more support within the Gaza strip and has outraged members of the international community against Israel. In particular, the Israeli government has made it difficult for the Gazans to acquire fuel. This has contributed to a burgeoning humanitarian crisis, in which hospitals do not have the fuel necessary to run their facilities. Hamas, perhaps in an effort to attenuate the crisis and appear as the heros, broke down parts of the Egyptian border so that Gazans could cross into Egypt and gather supplies. Thousands crossed the border into Egypt in pursuit of food.
The international community has put pressure on Israel to allow fuel back into Gaza. Israel has agreed for now. However, they say the withholding of fuel from the Gazans is part of a overarching strategy to combat terror through what can be described as "collective punishment". If the Gazans feel enough pressure, they will turn on their own community and root out potential terrorists. This policy, perhaps, is not working as well as Israel hopes. It might, in fact only perpetuat the problem. If Israel resorts to tactics that hurt the civilian population, they will increase its enemies and those who might have considered peaceful means of protest have no choice but to fight back violently in order to protect themselves and their families. They might want to reconsider their plan.
Whether a stated strategy of Hamas, the groups actions have elicited the kind of response from Israel that could be classified as part of the Indirect Strategy or Outside Intervention Strategy. This article discusses the most recent actions taken by the Israeli government to stop terrorist action against their citizens. These actions have been heavy-handed and have allowed Hamas to gain more support within the Gaza strip and has outraged members of the international community against Israel. In particular, the Israeli government has made it difficult for the Gazans to acquire fuel. This has contributed to a burgeoning humanitarian crisis, in which hospitals do not have the fuel necessary to run their facilities. Hamas, perhaps in an effort to attenuate the crisis and appear as the heros, broke down parts of the Egyptian border so that Gazans could cross into Egypt and gather supplies. Thousands crossed the border into Egypt in pursuit of food.
The international community has put pressure on Israel to allow fuel back into Gaza. Israel has agreed for now. However, they say the withholding of fuel from the Gazans is part of a overarching strategy to combat terror through what can be described as "collective punishment". If the Gazans feel enough pressure, they will turn on their own community and root out potential terrorists. This policy, perhaps, is not working as well as Israel hopes. It might, in fact only perpetuat the problem. If Israel resorts to tactics that hurt the civilian population, they will increase its enemies and those who might have considered peaceful means of protest have no choice but to fight back violently in order to protect themselves and their families. They might want to reconsider their plan.
Suicide Terror...
I am working on the paper that is due next Monday, and I found an article written by Ellen Townsend in which suicide terrorists are compared to suicidal individuals that are not connected with terrorist organizations. She found that suicide terrorists are not "suicidal" in the conventional sense. She then gives her opinion about what motivates people to be suicide terrorists. I hope people find this article useful if they are writing the second paper. If anyone has any other articles they found useful, please post them.
LINKS
To the left you will see a new set of "terrorism links." I took these from some of your posts. If any of you know of other useful websites on terrorism/counterterrorism/bioterrorism, etc., put the links in as comments with a little explanation of the site's importance.
US Must Increase Pressure On Pakistan To Control Terrorism In Tribal Areas
http://www.opednews.com/maxwrite/diarypage.php?did=5809
This article is on how the United States have attacked tribal areas in Pakistan. It talks about how Pakistan is a main Ally in fighting terrorism but how the United states still fears that terrorist are coming out of the tribal region. However, in the articel it said, "Most of the tribesmen think that US has made a bad deal with Pakistan. Why they have been opposing US presence in tribal areas? Actually Pakistani leaders have been using tribal areas for their game through which they have been earning dollars."
This caused Davos President Musharraf to say that he thinks the United States should worry on Iraq and Afganistan instead of involving itself in other areas.
The main question that I have from this article ishow will this affect the US, Pakistany relationships?
If anyone can help that would be great.
Thanks
Austin
This article is on how the United States have attacked tribal areas in Pakistan. It talks about how Pakistan is a main Ally in fighting terrorism but how the United states still fears that terrorist are coming out of the tribal region. However, in the articel it said, "Most of the tribesmen think that US has made a bad deal with Pakistan. Why they have been opposing US presence in tribal areas? Actually Pakistani leaders have been using tribal areas for their game through which they have been earning dollars."
This caused Davos President Musharraf to say that he thinks the United States should worry on Iraq and Afganistan instead of involving itself in other areas.
The main question that I have from this article ishow will this affect the US, Pakistany relationships?
If anyone can help that would be great.
Thanks
Austin
Sunday, January 27, 2008
France-India cooperation
I found this interesting article online about France and India cooperating to fight terrorism. You can find the here
At first I thought it was interesting to see cooperation between France and India, but then I read in the article that they actually have very similar goals and concerns as far as terrorism is concerned. For instance, they are both concerned with the issues of non-proliferation of nuclear weapons, and weapons of mass destruction. France is also worried that an increase in terrorism in Pakistan and Central Asia, could increase the number of terror-related incidences in Western Europe. The article stated: "Mr Sarkozy said extremism in one region has repercussions elsewhere too. "
I think it good to see such cooperation between countries that are so geographically distant from each other. It just goes to show us that countries are recognizing that globalization is weakening borders and the terrorist links between India and Pakistan, and Western Europe are growing stronger.
I would encourage you guys to read this article.
At first I thought it was interesting to see cooperation between France and India, but then I read in the article that they actually have very similar goals and concerns as far as terrorism is concerned. For instance, they are both concerned with the issues of non-proliferation of nuclear weapons, and weapons of mass destruction. France is also worried that an increase in terrorism in Pakistan and Central Asia, could increase the number of terror-related incidences in Western Europe. The article stated: "Mr Sarkozy said extremism in one region has repercussions elsewhere too. "
I think it good to see such cooperation between countries that are so geographically distant from each other. It just goes to show us that countries are recognizing that globalization is weakening borders and the terrorist links between India and Pakistan, and Western Europe are growing stronger.
I would encourage you guys to read this article.
Saturday, January 26, 2008
Taliban Activities in Kabul
This Economist article discusses the January 14th suicide bombing of an Afghani hotel. The bombing was notable because it exemplifies a recent shift in Taliban targets to include expatriates living in Kabul. This supports Bruce Hoffman's definition of terrorism: "the deliberate creation and exploitation of fear..." (see Inside Terrorism, p. 40). Because defining terrorism has been a central part of readings, class discussions, and papers, it's important that we recognize the role of fear as a goal of terrorism. Surely the Taliban wants to stir fear in Kabul's foreigners (many of whom are Westerners and byproducts of globalization...which, as discussed in class on Friday, is often severely disliked), otherwise they would not have shifted their violence to include these expatriates, who had thought their hotel to be secure. Why do terrorists want the power to make others afraid? Because enough fear can cripple those who are currently stronger than them. (Remember Paul Pillar defined terrorism as "the quintessential weapon of the weak against the strong" on p. 1 of Terrorism and US Foreign Policy.) Fear may be used to chain supporters or to chase away potential targets.
Spreading of Afgan Violence Into Pakistan
In the New York Times for Friday, January 18th, it contained an article about the spread of violence from the Taliban and Al Qaeda into Pakistan. I thought this was particularly an interesting article because of the change of strategy of many of the Taliban. Obviously the Taliban have an ultimate goal of regaining control of Afghanistan, but many of them are taking refuge in parts of Pakistan. In the town of Peshawar they are especially having difficulties with the Taliban and Al Qaeda insurgents. There appears to be an attempt to overtake the town by the insurgents and according to many involved in the fight, the insurgents are doing quite well. The people are starting to lose their faith in the government and the police fear for their safety. It appears that the insurgents could very well take this territory for their own. I thought that was kind of interesting because I was not aware of too many areas where the insurgents really held land other than small tribal areas outside of this town. It would be interesting to see how the fight evolves from there. I also wonder, what really would be the significance and result if the insurgents did take a town like Peshawar? Especially since Pakistan is not a region that American forces have been fighting the insurgents.
Thursday, January 24, 2008
Counterterrorism Calender
*Please do not count this as a graded post*
I know you've all been waiting for this, but the time has finally come. The National Counterterrorism Center has just released the 2008 Counterterrorism Calender. It includes all sorts of interesting information on terrorism, from profiles of the most-wanted terrorists in the world, to terrorist logos, how to spot a fake passport, and something titled "TNT Equivalents for Various Explosives and Fuel-Air Mixtures".
Here it is in pdf form. FYI, it's like 24 mb, so make sure you have a strong internet connection.
I know you've all been waiting for this, but the time has finally come. The National Counterterrorism Center has just released the 2008 Counterterrorism Calender. It includes all sorts of interesting information on terrorism, from profiles of the most-wanted terrorists in the world, to terrorist logos, how to spot a fake passport, and something titled "TNT Equivalents for Various Explosives and Fuel-Air Mixtures".
Here it is in pdf form. FYI, it's like 24 mb, so make sure you have a strong internet connection.
Habeas Corpus and Detainees...
Reading the Padilla article brought me to searching the net for more on the Detainees' Appeal to repeal the Detainee Treatment act.
Here is the interesting article about the rights of the detainees in Gitmo as they currently stand. It seems the detainees suddenly really like the western world, they embrace the constitution and all of its intricacies, claiming they have a right to Habeas Corpus. How can someone go from working to topple the government of the US and then whole heartedly expect that the US would give them any rights let alone the same rights as a citizen.
The founding fathers had a clear understanding that treason would be treated as a death penalty offense and in regards to those who participated in British attacks on Americans, or were caught sharing intel with the British would be killed with a simple trial requiring that the evidence be presented and judgment passed. I do think the trials are taking longer than necessary to complete, but the persons still being held are the ones which a legitimate threat has been found, not the other 4000 we have released without harm.
I am obviously a constructionist in this matter but when dealing with traitors why should we grant them the rights they so willingly gave up when plotting attacks against us? Doesn't being a citizen come with any special rights? (ie bill of rights, for the people of the US, not the people against it)
Here is the interesting article about the rights of the detainees in Gitmo as they currently stand. It seems the detainees suddenly really like the western world, they embrace the constitution and all of its intricacies, claiming they have a right to Habeas Corpus. How can someone go from working to topple the government of the US and then whole heartedly expect that the US would give them any rights let alone the same rights as a citizen.
The founding fathers had a clear understanding that treason would be treated as a death penalty offense and in regards to those who participated in British attacks on Americans, or were caught sharing intel with the British would be killed with a simple trial requiring that the evidence be presented and judgment passed. I do think the trials are taking longer than necessary to complete, but the persons still being held are the ones which a legitimate threat has been found, not the other 4000 we have released without harm.
I am obviously a constructionist in this matter but when dealing with traitors why should we grant them the rights they so willingly gave up when plotting attacks against us? Doesn't being a citizen come with any special rights? (ie bill of rights, for the people of the US, not the people against it)
Tuesday, January 22, 2008
Padilla's Sentencing
I have to say I am oh so fond of how caring our judges are to terrorist conspirators and how concerned we all are over their "treatment." It seems that we are quick to forget that these conspirators sought to kill, maim, destroy Americans and our interests. Regardless of their status as a citizen or not, upon committing treason and such acts, in my mind you have in large part forfeited your generally applicable constitutional rights. I do not condone detention of innocents and people who have no formal charges brought against them, but then again I am not for indefinite appeals and abuse of our legal system by terrorists and criminals. A "Quick and speedy trial" is not just the government's duty to ensure, but is also a responsibility of the accused. So often I see our system abused by those who have informal connections with other governments, private interest groups or other wealthy backers. Justice is not blind in this country. We have become a country full of people who sell our justice for a price, and sometimes it doesn't even cost that much, and our judges just coddle criminals because they have their own agenda, which is a far cry from the oath which they are supposed to uphold. See article on Padilla's sentencing.
Iraqis Stepping it Up
I read this this morning, and a few things struck me as particularly interesting. First was the young age of the bomber, 13 or 14! I did not know that terrorist groups recruited kids that young. Second, and more profound in my view, is that the local people condemned the act, even burning the house of the family of the bomber. In the 6th paragraph, they quote one of the locals as saying "We will not permit anyone with this ideology to stay in our village." I'm wondering if this viewpoint, an open and violent rejection of radical Islam, is more widespread than reported in the media. Certainly it would help the United States if the locals also took it upon themselves to eradicate radical Islam as they do not benefit from terrorism any more than the US does. I think that they media portrays the Iraqis as not liking the American presence, but I also believe that, as shown in this article and a documentary I recently watched in another class (Frontline: The Insurgency), that Iraqis need the help of the US to fight the terrorist. Iraq would be in a catastrophic state if we weren't there and if we leave too soon. (Yet one more reason not to vote for Hillary Clinton: "I will get the troops out within 60 days of taking the presidency." Yeah right.) However, I do believe that the Iraqis need to start taking more responsibility in their government. The US can not be their crutch. And as this article shows, the Iraqis are sick of terrorism too and are taking matters of destroying terrorism into their own hands, which can only be beneficial for the US.
Monday, January 21, 2008
Sympathizers Seek Answers From al-Qaida
http://http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/01/21/AR2008012100817_3.html
Apparently al-Qaida opened a website for a limited period of time in which sympathizers could ask questions of the organization. A broad range of questions were asked concerning al-Qaida's intentions and strategies for future attacks. Many sympathizers wanted to know why further attacks had not been made against the U.S., and those claiming to be part of al-Qaida asked for direction for future attacks. The Associated Press isn't certain that the site is legitimate, and they don't know if the claimed sympathizers are actually members of al-Qaida. No answers to the hundreds of questions posed to al-Qaida have been answered. I don't know what to make of the site. It seems a bit hokey. Any comments?
Apparently al-Qaida opened a website for a limited period of time in which sympathizers could ask questions of the organization. A broad range of questions were asked concerning al-Qaida's intentions and strategies for future attacks. Many sympathizers wanted to know why further attacks had not been made against the U.S., and those claiming to be part of al-Qaida asked for direction for future attacks. The Associated Press isn't certain that the site is legitimate, and they don't know if the claimed sympathizers are actually members of al-Qaida. No answers to the hundreds of questions posed to al-Qaida have been answered. I don't know what to make of the site. It seems a bit hokey. Any comments?
Sunday, January 20, 2008
Terrorism mis-defined
Like my last post, I found another article that describes a recent event in which I believe the term "terrorism" was incorrectly applied. You can find the article here
Besides some perhaps suspicious activity, the government of Kenya has no reason to believe that these individuals are involved in terrorist organizations.
I guess it's possible, and likely, that the government of Kenya has a different definition of terrorism then the US gov't does, but I don't see how this suspicious activity (and it is suspicious) can be identified as terrorism so quickly.
Besides some perhaps suspicious activity, the government of Kenya has no reason to believe that these individuals are involved in terrorist organizations.
I guess it's possible, and likely, that the government of Kenya has a different definition of terrorism then the US gov't does, but I don't see how this suspicious activity (and it is suspicious) can be identified as terrorism so quickly.
Lankan President lauds Indian policy on terrorism
Hey guys I read this article on Sri Lankan President Mahinda Rajapakse and his interaction with India. He said, Colombo was having regular interaction with New Delhi on the developments related to ethnic conflict in the island nation. It looks like Rajapakse is working with India to fight terrorism. I was wondering if anyone knows what terrorism groups are in the region. Or if anyone knows the United States views on this. I hope you like the article and it brings some good feedback.
Thanks
austin
http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/holnus/001200801201412.htm
Thanks
austin
http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/holnus/001200801201412.htm
Saturday, January 19, 2008
Tamil Tigers' Tactics
The Tamil Tigers are again wreaking havoc in Sri Lanka. According to an Economist briefing from the January 12-18 edition, a government official was killed in the bombing near Colombo. (I couldn't find it on the Economist website, but it's on p. 8 of the journal under the heading "A violent state of affairs"). I've read a few NYT articles on the recent bombings and shootings, trying to find more information, but none of them mentioned the death of a government minister. However, the mentioning in the Economist caught my attention because it could shed greater light on the Tigers' strategies. If they are randomly exploding bombs in public places, perhaps they are just trying to get international attention (and influence within the state). Yet, if the Colombo bomb was purposefully exploded to kill the late government minister, then perhaps they were employing the "decapitation" strategy discussed in class. Granted, they did not assassinate the head of state, but they did kill a state leader. We can't really make this call without more information though; to identify the strategy (or strategies) used, we would need to know if the minister was a deliberate victim of the terrorist act.
Thursday, January 17, 2008
MAKE SURE I CAN TELL WHO YOU ARE
This is Brent Mangum. Prof. Payne has asked me to keep track of who is posting or commenting. I can usually look through email names or match up initials to the person who deserves credit, but let's not make my job unnecessarily hard. If you want to stay semi ananamous, just a first name or last name is fine. Also, if you've gone back a few days and commented on an old post, let me know. I usually go back a few days to see if there are new comments on old posts, but if you want to make sure I don't miss yours, again, let me know. Thanks.
More violence in Iraq
The Article
Today in Iraq is the Shi'ite holy holiday of Ashura. A suicide bomber exploded a bomb near a mosque in Baquba and killed eight people and wounded another fourteen. What is interesting about both the location of the attack as well as those targeted in the attack is that over the past few years, the US military has been fighting Sunni and al Qaeda insurgents in the area and the area has been described as very violent. In fact, the article states that suspected al Qaeda attacks have killed over 171 during the holiday of Ashura in 2004. While the article mentions no suspects, (other than the bomber himself), al Qaeda can be considered a prime sponsor suspect. This particular bombing reminds me of what we learned in class regarding terrorist strategies. This is an example of indirect action. Sunni insurgents hope that by committing terrorist acts that the government will brutally repress the people and that the people will respond by revolting against the government. This principle is happening right now in Iraq. In response to previously bloody Ashura's, the government is cracking down on people's liberty in order to minimize death. For example, the government has imposed vehicle curfews all over southern Iraq in order to protect Shi'ites observing Ashura. Sunni militants also hope that their attacks will provoke a violent response by Shi'ites thereby escalating the level of violence in the country.
Today in Iraq is the Shi'ite holy holiday of Ashura. A suicide bomber exploded a bomb near a mosque in Baquba and killed eight people and wounded another fourteen. What is interesting about both the location of the attack as well as those targeted in the attack is that over the past few years, the US military has been fighting Sunni and al Qaeda insurgents in the area and the area has been described as very violent. In fact, the article states that suspected al Qaeda attacks have killed over 171 during the holiday of Ashura in 2004. While the article mentions no suspects, (other than the bomber himself), al Qaeda can be considered a prime sponsor suspect. This particular bombing reminds me of what we learned in class regarding terrorist strategies. This is an example of indirect action. Sunni insurgents hope that by committing terrorist acts that the government will brutally repress the people and that the people will respond by revolting against the government. This principle is happening right now in Iraq. In response to previously bloody Ashura's, the government is cracking down on people's liberty in order to minimize death. For example, the government has imposed vehicle curfews all over southern Iraq in order to protect Shi'ites observing Ashura. Sunni militants also hope that their attacks will provoke a violent response by Shi'ites thereby escalating the level of violence in the country.
Wednesday, January 16, 2008
Tamil Tigers Continue to Kill in the Wake of Ceasefire...
the article...
Wednesday morning the Tamil Tigers struck at a bus of civilians, initially using a roadside bomb to blow the bus off the road, and then shooting at the fleeing survivors. 26 were killed with another 62 injured.
President Mahinda Rajapaksa commented, ''This is a brazen demonstration to the whole world of its unchanged commitment to terrorism and the absolute rejection of democracy and all norms of civilized behavior in the pursuit of its unacceptable goal of separation.''
The Tamils are labeled as a terrorist group in both the US and the EU.
In class the other day we were discussing the desire of terrorist organizations to do things that would get the attention of the media and the world. However, it seems that the Tamil Tigers are not in the mood to accept responsibility for the attacks they make. This is interesting because it is so different from the frequency other groups, such as Al-Qaida, claim responsibility for attacks they have perpetrated. In class we also discussed the possibility of a group claiming responsibility for attacks it did not commit, but the idea of not claiming responsibility was not discussed, and at least I did not even consider it. Perhaps this is the Tamil's way of trying not to appear as a terrorist organization...?
Wednesday morning the Tamil Tigers struck at a bus of civilians, initially using a roadside bomb to blow the bus off the road, and then shooting at the fleeing survivors. 26 were killed with another 62 injured.
President Mahinda Rajapaksa commented, ''This is a brazen demonstration to the whole world of its unchanged commitment to terrorism and the absolute rejection of democracy and all norms of civilized behavior in the pursuit of its unacceptable goal of separation.''
The Tamils are labeled as a terrorist group in both the US and the EU.
In class the other day we were discussing the desire of terrorist organizations to do things that would get the attention of the media and the world. However, it seems that the Tamil Tigers are not in the mood to accept responsibility for the attacks they make. This is interesting because it is so different from the frequency other groups, such as Al-Qaida, claim responsibility for attacks they have perpetrated. In class we also discussed the possibility of a group claiming responsibility for attacks it did not commit, but the idea of not claiming responsibility was not discussed, and at least I did not even consider it. Perhaps this is the Tamil's way of trying not to appear as a terrorist organization...?
Modernity and the spread of Terrorism
This article is important for a significant number of factors. First, it is a perfect example of how Al-Qaeda and other similar terrorist organizations use the internet for propaganda and publicity towards their cause. Second, it helps debunk the myth that most terrorists are poor and uneducated. And third, it throws light on the fact that terrorists use the technological means available to achieve their objectives and that the media is indispensable to spreading their cause.
This leads me to speculate about the extent to which modernity is both a cause and a means of terrorism. I believe that it may be a cause because terrorism is in many ways a response to western cultural imperialism, be it the colonization of foreign territories or signing of treaties which allow one ethnic group to usurp the homeland belonging to another ethnic nationality(for example: Israel) . Similarly, I believe that advances in the field of communication and transportation have been used by terrorists as a means to gain publicity towards their cause.
This may be something we want to think about as a class.
Great Terrorism website
Here is a link to a website I found that has tons of terrorism resources. This should definitely be helpful for our presentations. You can search for a terrorist group by region, or ideology. You can also search terrorism incidents by location, number of fatalities, or even weapons used. It also has a database of known terrorist leaders. Basically, it has everything you could ever want to know about terrorist groups. The links section includes tons of other useful websites. The further reference section contains tons of articles on terrorism. It's a really interesting website to just browse through. Some of the stuff they have is surprising. Anyone that has taken Pl Sc 328 will find the National Counterterrorism Center WITS Dataset interesting (And if you haven't taken 328, and can avoid it, don't take it). Enjoy!
Congressional Terrorist
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8U76PK82&show_article=1
This link will take you to an article that discusses the involvement of former US congressman and UN representative Mark Deli Siljander, a Republican from Michigan, in aiding a known terrorist in Pakistan. The allegation goes, that Siljander was working as a fundraiser for an Islamic charity that was sending money to supposed orphanages that later turned out to only be the addresses of personal property of a known terrorist Gulbuddin Hekmatyar.
Moreover, Representative Siljander is accused of taking $50,000 from the Islamic American Relief Agency for lobbying. As it turns out the $50,000 dollars was supposedly stolen from the US Agency for International Development. In other words, a US representative accepted stolen money from a charity that was using its donations to fund terrorists linked with the Taliban and Al Qieda. The same representative also aided the organization in gaining the funding that it needed to operate. Does Siljander qualify as a terrorist?
I feel that as long as he knew that he was supporting an organization that was directly funding a terrorist he is also a terrorist. Our readings point out that different members of terrorist cells and organizations have different responsibilities. Former Representative Siljander may not have ever fired a weapon or detonated a bomb, but he was fundamental in securing funding for organizations that are engaging in just such activities.
This link will take you to an article that discusses the involvement of former US congressman and UN representative Mark Deli Siljander, a Republican from Michigan, in aiding a known terrorist in Pakistan. The allegation goes, that Siljander was working as a fundraiser for an Islamic charity that was sending money to supposed orphanages that later turned out to only be the addresses of personal property of a known terrorist Gulbuddin Hekmatyar.
Moreover, Representative Siljander is accused of taking $50,000 from the Islamic American Relief Agency for lobbying. As it turns out the $50,000 dollars was supposedly stolen from the US Agency for International Development. In other words, a US representative accepted stolen money from a charity that was using its donations to fund terrorists linked with the Taliban and Al Qieda. The same representative also aided the organization in gaining the funding that it needed to operate. Does Siljander qualify as a terrorist?
I feel that as long as he knew that he was supporting an organization that was directly funding a terrorist he is also a terrorist. Our readings point out that different members of terrorist cells and organizations have different responsibilities. Former Representative Siljander may not have ever fired a weapon or detonated a bomb, but he was fundamental in securing funding for organizations that are engaging in just such activities.
Ex-US Congressman lobbies for Al-Qaeda
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5hw36mXsH7fbogLzqW06NU31aQAmgD8U77NV81
Today, former US Congressman (GOP, MI) Marc Deli Siljander was indicted for his role in laundering at least $130,000 to al-Qaeda. For his work as a lobbyist for the Islamic American Relief Agency (IARA), Siljander is said to have received $50,000. Instead of using its donations from USAID for development in Africa, IARA paid Silijander $50,000 and sent the rest of the money to an al-Qaeda contact in Pakistan.
In class today, we talked about the means whereby terrorists carry out their operations; one of those means was fundraising. It’s truly scary and appalling to find out that a US congressman was involved in such activities. I can’t help but point out a parallel between this occurrence and what Moroni wrote in Ether 8:23-25:
“Wherefore, O ye Gentiles, it is wisdom in God that these things should be shown unto you, that thereby ye may repent of your sins, and suffer not that these murderous combinations shall get above you, which are built up to get power and gain—and the work, yea, even the work of destruction come upon you, yea, even the sword of the justice of the Eternal God shall fall upon you, to your overthrow and destruction if ye shall suffer these things to be.
Wherefore, the Lord commandeth you, when ye shall see these things come among you that ye shall awake to a sense of your awful situation, because of this secret combination which shall be among you; or wo be unto it, because of the blood of them who have been slain; for they cry from the dust for vengeance upon it, and also upon those who built it up.
For it cometh to pass that whoso buildeth it up seeketh to overthrow the freedom of all lands, nations, and countries…”
Evolution of Terrorism or a Decline of Terrorism in Iraq?
On the New York Times web site, there was an article posted in which it talked about a recent attack that took place in the Iraqi region of Diyala. The interesting circumstances about this attack versus many others was the fact it was conducted by a woman. I guess the trend is turning toward more attacks by women. The post on the article actually has changed to some degree since I originally read it, so I'll share some of what it mentioned additionally. Apparently it suggested two opposing viewpoints as far as what this trend really means. U.S. officials suggest that this means the insurgent forces are losing numbers and are required to rely upon women in order to carry out such attacks. The opposing view is the idea that women are typically considered to be less of a threat and their clothing make it easier to conceal explosives and so it is advantageous to use women to carry out such attacks.
These opposing viewpoints really bring up some interesting issues. The first viewpoint was suggested by U.S. officials. It's reasonable to ask if this is just spin coming from the government in order to help support the effort in Iraq. It does seem reasonable that women could become the new suicide bombers because insurgent forces are reduced to few but women, but the likelihood is questionable. Now the other theory suggests an evolution in terrorist tactics by using women for the reasons stated above. For me, this seems a bit more likely of an outcome, especially because women are not treated as equals in most Arab cultures, so it seems like they would be more "expendable" for terrorist organizations. Certainly there seems to be a lot of strength in this tactic because of Western chivalric attitudes toward women. Women are not typically seen as threats and as potential combatants and certainly there is an attitude of preserving women from attack and doing them no harm. If this really is an evolution in terrorist tactics, it appears that it will be another difficult battle for counterterrorist forces to learn how to combat.
The link above should take you to an article concerning the escape of a suspected terrorism from a Pakistani prison. This suspect was supposed to be awaiting trial for a plot to blow up a British airplane. I chose to post this article because I feel that it punctuates an important problem with counter terrorism. At times cooperation between nations is at best limited. Pakistan has allowed many US and NATO participant operations within their borders since 9/11 compared to before. However, a large problem arises when are allies (even if they are limited allies) do not have the capability to carry out operations of their own. This may result from limited resources, or from elements of their societies who sympathize with the terrorist causes. Some governments may also realize that they cannot jeopardize international relations with world super powers if they are going to compete in a global economy, but only make marginal efforts to help. For example, Indonesia has responded to terrorist attacks against Western citizens, but their response is generally incredibly lenient. One individual convicted for the Bali blast in 2005 by Indonesia, received a two year sentence, which was later commuted after only 18 months.
Tuesday, January 15, 2008
Death of bin Laden?
I was browsing through international news agencies and came across this report found on a Russian? news site:
Greg Scott
Benazir Bhutto named Osama bin Laden’s killer before her death
Bhutto said, "Omar Sheikh is the man who murdered Osama bin Laden." Bhutto said this in an interview with Al-Jazeera on Nov. 2. You can view it here: Video. I haven't heard this claim on the U.S. news wires and wonder why.Greg Scott
Monday, January 14, 2008
Suicide Terrorism
http://www.amconmag.com/2005_07_18/article.html
The Logic of Suicide Terrorism: It's the Occupation, not the Fundamentalism
In this article, Robert Pape of the University of Chicago asserts that suicide terror is driven not by Islamic Fundamentalism, but by terrorist's wish to rid their homelands of foreign forces. His argument does not persuade me because while occupation may be the chief concern that causes terrorists to commit acts of violence, the motivation to perfrom suicide terror may be influenced by many different grievances terrorist groups have against those people occupying their homelands. When considering why a group might be opposed to foreign occupation, differences in religion would defintely be something to consider. Such differneces could drive individuals to perform acts of suicide terror in the hopes of liberating the homeland. I would be interested in finding out what others think about this article. It is a quick and interesting read, and it does have some good points.
The Logic of Suicide Terrorism: It's the Occupation, not the Fundamentalism
In this article, Robert Pape of the University of Chicago asserts that suicide terror is driven not by Islamic Fundamentalism, but by terrorist's wish to rid their homelands of foreign forces. His argument does not persuade me because while occupation may be the chief concern that causes terrorists to commit acts of violence, the motivation to perfrom suicide terror may be influenced by many different grievances terrorist groups have against those people occupying their homelands. When considering why a group might be opposed to foreign occupation, differences in religion would defintely be something to consider. Such differneces could drive individuals to perform acts of suicide terror in the hopes of liberating the homeland. I would be interested in finding out what others think about this article. It is a quick and interesting read, and it does have some good points.
Terrorism Research Center
Hey guys, I just came across this site: http://www.terrorism.com/index.php
Check it out
Check it out
Sunday, January 13, 2008
Al-Qaeda's Buildup of White Operatives
Story, Jan 13, 2008 - http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,322419,00.html
After reading this article I wondered what are the motivations behind white British citizens converting to Islam with the intent of funding and supporting Al-Qaeda. Within the article it semi explained why, "One reported strategy the terrorists use is to look for converts in prisons, where those in custody tend to be lonely and particularly susceptible. Recruiters comfort and support the inmate, with little mention — if any — to religion, according to the paper. Over time, conversations turn more radical."
Could it be that people join the organization for no other purpose than to belong? From the little I know about gangs, I understand that many members join the gang because it gives them purpose and a sense of belonging (like a family). These converts to Al-Qaeda seem, from the paragraph above, that that's all they are looking for. The Al-Qaeda "missionaries" (for a lack of a better term) prey on those that are lonely and oppressed. This kind of recruitment of course bothers me but it doesn't surprise me.
Greg
After reading this article I wondered what are the motivations behind white British citizens converting to Islam with the intent of funding and supporting Al-Qaeda. Within the article it semi explained why, "One reported strategy the terrorists use is to look for converts in prisons, where those in custody tend to be lonely and particularly susceptible. Recruiters comfort and support the inmate, with little mention — if any — to religion, according to the paper. Over time, conversations turn more radical."
Could it be that people join the organization for no other purpose than to belong? From the little I know about gangs, I understand that many members join the gang because it gives them purpose and a sense of belonging (like a family). These converts to Al-Qaeda seem, from the paragraph above, that that's all they are looking for. The Al-Qaeda "missionaries" (for a lack of a better term) prey on those that are lonely and oppressed. This kind of recruitment of course bothers me but it doesn't surprise me.
Greg
Defining Terrorism
An example of a debate regarding the definition of a "terrorist" can be found here: http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/local/article/0,1299,DRMN_15_5554923,00.html.
This news story is from early last year, but it is definitely relevant to this concept. It outlines a case where environmentalists were deemed "terrorists" in a District Court. What is particularly interesting is the public outrage that surrounded these charges. Many people felt uncomfortable putting the individuals who were responsible for a number of fires in the mid-1990s in the same category of Osama bin Laden. The attorney in charge of the state's case, however, argued that the group used fear and intimidation in order to influence the government; this, he said qualified the group as one of "terrorists."
It is true that the definition of terrorism can vary; however, how do we decide on one definition on which to base our laws?
This news story is from early last year, but it is definitely relevant to this concept. It outlines a case where environmentalists were deemed "terrorists" in a District Court. What is particularly interesting is the public outrage that surrounded these charges. Many people felt uncomfortable putting the individuals who were responsible for a number of fires in the mid-1990s in the same category of Osama bin Laden. The attorney in charge of the state's case, however, argued that the group used fear and intimidation in order to influence the government; this, he said qualified the group as one of "terrorists."
It is true that the definition of terrorism can vary; however, how do we decide on one definition on which to base our laws?
Terrorism and things you can do
http://www.redcross.org/services/disaster/0,1082,0_589_,00.html
I was looking around about different things that organizations have created in case of a terrorist attack, when I found this on the American Red Cross website. In this article the redcross tells you what to do in case of a terrorist attack from creating a distaster supply kit, evacuation meeting spots and emergency plans. It also told a little about what to do if a terrorist disaster occurs. And finally it tells about some positive steps that people can do in case of a disaster. I think this shows how much the 9/11 attacks on us, has everyone on a higher caution level then they were before. I hope this can inform a couple people about what they could do to prepare for a terrorist attack.
I was looking around about different things that organizations have created in case of a terrorist attack, when I found this on the American Red Cross website. In this article the redcross tells you what to do in case of a terrorist attack from creating a distaster supply kit, evacuation meeting spots and emergency plans. It also told a little about what to do if a terrorist disaster occurs. And finally it tells about some positive steps that people can do in case of a disaster. I think this shows how much the 9/11 attacks on us, has everyone on a higher caution level then they were before. I hope this can inform a couple people about what they could do to prepare for a terrorist attack.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)